Politics & Government

$905,000 False Advertising Judgment Against Sensa 'Sprinkle Diet' Makers

Sonoma County one of 9 Calif. counties included in settlement.

 

A false advertising lawsuit against Sensa Products LLC, a Delaware company and its parent company, Intelligent Beauty, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, was settled last week when the defendants agreed to the terms of a $905,000 judgment against both companies, Sonoma County District Attorney Jill Ravitch announced today.

 “District Attorneys and law enforcement agencies will continue to work together regionally to protect consumers from products that are sold with false and misleading claims,” Ravitch said Tuesday.

Find out what's happening in Rohnert Park-Cotatiwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

In addition to Ravitch, the false advertising lawsuit was filed in Santa Cruz County by district attorneys for the Counties of Alameda, Marin, Monterey, Napa, Orange, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, and Solano.
 

The so-called Sensa "sprinkle diet" is sold nationwide and became the subject of a Statewide Nutritional Supplement Task Force investigation after claiming the efficacy of the product had been clinically proven in the largest clinical study ever conducted. 

Find out what's happening in Rohnert Park-Cotatiwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Sensa claims consumers will lose weight by sprinkling their flavored “tastants” on their food.  As part of the final judgment, the defendants agreed to pay civil penalties and costs in the amount of $800,000 to be used for the enforcement of consumer protection laws and restitution to California customers of $105,000.

Sensa Products LLC and Intelligent Beauty Inc. are permanently enjoined from making any claims regarding the efficacy or effects of any of their products without possessing competent and reliable scientific evidence that substantiates the claims. 

They are also prohibited from continuing to charge customers for shipments sent after a customer has asked to stop shipments, from enrolling a customer in an automatic shipment program without a clear and conspicuous disclosure of the customer's obligations and before obtaining the customer’s affirmative consent, and from advertising a refund policy unless they clearly, conspicuously and in close proximity disclose any exclusions to the policy. 

Deputy District Attorney Matthew Cheever handled the case for Sonoma County.

Stay Patched in! Follow Healdsburg Patch on Twitter | Like Healdsburg Patch on Facebook | Sign up for the daily email with links to the latest news.

Stay Patched in! Follow Rohnert Park Patch on _Twitter |_ Like Rohnert Park Patch on _Facebook_| _Sign up for the daily email_ with links to the latest news.

 


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here